top of page
Search

Business model drivers for carrier-grade Wi-Fi offload deployment

  • Mark Middleton
  • May 13, 2013
  • 2 min read


Mobile network operators (MNOs) look to both cost-avoidance and value enhancement when justifying the business case for a carrier-grade Wi-Fi offload implementation.

We use the word implementation, because it may be that the MNO does not actually deploy its own carrier-grade metro Wi-Fi network. That would require the MNO to deploy, own and operate a Wi-Fi network over and above its cellular network. This may not suit all MNOs (from a capex, opex and focus perspective) – the number of Wi-Fi sites is significantly greater than the number of cell sites. For example, in a dense urban environment, 20-30 multi-radio wireless nodes per square km may be required. Instead, the MNO may chose to take advantage of an existing carrier-grade metro Wi-Fi deployment and license or lease an SSID on that network (in effect getting a virtual slice of that network). This can save the MNO the upfront deployment capex, as well as the ongoing network management obligations – the MNO simply pays a monthly fee to the network operator for the virtual slice of the network. Deployment and operation of the network is handled by the Wi-Fi network operator. The MNO becomes and Wi-Fi virtual network operator (WVNO).

From an WVNO subscriber and marketing/branding perspective, given that the WVNO has its own SSID, it appears like the its own network. With a VLAN from the Wi-Fi network edge into the mobile core, the MNO has full control over all authentication, authorisation and accounting on that MNO’s virtual Wi-Fi network. It is possible for the Wi-Fi network owner to lease a number of virtual slices of the same single set of network infrastructure. MVNOs are, today, completely familiar with this model.

The decision to offer Wi-Fi offload services to subscribers comes with a cost to the MNO. Whether it is the upfront capex and then network opex on an MNO’s own Wi-Fi network or simply the cost of leasing a virtual SSID on a third party network, a business case needs to be established and proven. Informa have identified 11 business models used to underpin broader investment into carrier grade Wi-Fi. These are set out in this diagram:


The mature, established and growing categories highlight the well-known drivers for metro Wi-Fi investment. These are standalone access, wholesale capacity and of coure Wi-Fi offload/enhanced fixed broadband proposition. Standalone and Wi-Fi Offload are generally cost-avoidance categories, whereas wholesale and enhanced fixed broadband propositions are generally value enhancing opportunities for the MNO. Cost-avoidance examples include the reduction in capacity-based network core licensing fees that vendors may charge a MNO. Offloading traffic onto the Wi-Fi network will result in reduced traffic going through the core.

This can reduce or slow down the growth in capacity license fees payable.


 
 
 

Comments


Acurix Networks logo

With Acurix Networks Managed Public Wi-Fi Service, you can trust that your Wi-Fi network is in good hands, allowing you to focus on providing a great experience for your patrons.

Contact us today to learn more about how we can enhance your Wi-Fi experience.

Success! Message received.

© 2024 by Acurix Networks

Unit 5, 348 Victoria Road.

Malaga. Perth.

Western Australia. 6090.

www.acurixnetworks.com

support.acurixnetworks.com

 

TEL AU: +61 8 9468 5100

SUPPORT: 1800 113 582

bottom of page